What is program evaluation?
What evaluation is, the questions it answers, the main types, the six steps in CDC's 2024 framework and what to prepare before you start.
Funders, boards and agencies want to know whether a program works, and program teams want to know what to change. We help you ask the right evaluation questions, collect credible evidence and turn it into findings and recommendations people can act on.
Program evaluation is a structured way to find out how well a program is working and how to improve it. It answers practical questions: Is the program being delivered as planned? Is it reaching the people it was designed for? Are participants better off, and in what ways? What should change?
It is different from research. Research aims to produce general knowledge, often through controlled studies. Evaluation serves a specific program and the people who run, fund and use it, and it has to work within the program's real data, budget and timelines.
Evaluation is most often requested by:
We work with your program team rather than around it. You get an evaluation that answers the questions your funders and leaders care about, uses data you can realistically collect, and ends in recommendations your team can act on.
Where a program has not yet defined its population or priorities, a needs assessment is often the better first step. Where the findings point to changes in how services are delivered, quality improvement helps you test and track those changes.
| Type | Question | Possible data |
|---|---|---|
| Process | Are home visits happening at the planned frequency? | Visit logs |
| Process | Which barriers do workers report most often? | Staff interviews |
| Outcome | Do participants report better access to primary care after six months? | Participant survey |
| Outcome | Are referrals completed more often than before the program started? | Referral records |
Most evaluations start with a planning session to agree the purpose, the questions and the data you already hold. From there we prepare a written scope with deliverables, responsibilities and costs in US dollars (USD). To see how we work with health departments, nonprofits and partners, visit our health and public sector page.
The exact list is agreed in writing for each project. These are the usual deliverables and the usual boundaries.
Most delays in this kind of work come from access and decisions, not from the technical build. Knowing these early keeps the project predictable.
Each stage ends with something you can review before the next one starts.
Agree why the evaluation is needed, who will use it, the program's stage and the constraints on time, budget and data.
Output: A short scoping note and agreed timeline.
Work with your team to map activities, the population served and expected outcomes in a logic model.
Output: A logic model your team agrees reflects the program.
Choose the evaluation questions, the indicators and the methods that can answer them credibly within your resources.
Output: An evaluation plan and measurement framework.
Collect and check data from records, surveys, interviews or focus groups, with privacy safeguards agreed in advance.
Output: Clean, documented data sets and interview notes.
Analyze the data, test findings with your team and separate what the evidence shows from what it cannot show.
Output: Draft findings for review.
Deliver a report and briefing, and agree which recommendations to act on and how progress will be tracked.
Output: Final report, briefing and recommendations.
We do not publish package prices. Each estimate is based on an agreed scope, in US dollars, with taxes shown separately. These are the things that move the number most:
A process evaluation looks at how a program is delivered, for example whether activities happen as planned, who takes part and what gets in the way. An outcome evaluation looks at what changes for participants or communities, such as knowledge, behavior or access to services. Many evaluations combine both.
Proving cause usually needs a comparison group and a formal study design, which most programs do not have. We say clearly what the evidence can support, such as changes observed among participants, and what it cannot.
Yes, when it helps. We can structure the work around the CDC Program Evaluation Framework, 2024, which many public health funders and agencies recognize, or around the framework your funder specifies.
Usually not. Most questions can be answered with de-identified or summary data. If identifiable health information is unavoidable, we agree in writing how it is handled before any is shared, including a business associate agreement where HIPAA requires one.
We can draft the evaluation plan, logic model and measures for a proposal. Your organization remains responsible for the application and for any commitments it makes to the funder.
What evaluation is, the questions it answers, the main types, the six steps in CDC's 2024 framework and what to prepare before you start.
Understand what a population or organization needs, where services fall short, and which priorities deserve investment first.
Turn program and operational data into accurate, regular reports and dashboards that funders, boards and managers can trust.
Program evaluation, needs assessments, data analysis, quality improvement and health technology for agencies, health organizations, nonprofits and primes.
Tell us about the program, its funder and the questions you need answered. We will reply to arrange a conversation about scope and timing.